The Osun State Governorship Election Petition Tribunal sitting in
Abuja has declared Ademola Adeleke as winner of the September 2018
election in the state and ordered the Independent National Electoral
Commission to issue him with the certificate of return.
Abuja has declared Ademola Adeleke as winner of the September 2018
election in the state and ordered the Independent National Electoral
Commission to issue him with the certificate of return.
![]() |
Ademola Adeleke |
In a split decision, two of the three-man tribunal upheld the
petitions filed by the candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP),
Ademola Adeleke and the PDP, challenging the victory of the All
Progressives Congress (APC) and Governor Gboyega Oyetola at the
September 2018 governorship election.
petitions filed by the candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP),
Ademola Adeleke and the PDP, challenging the victory of the All
Progressives Congress (APC) and Governor Gboyega Oyetola at the
September 2018 governorship election.
The Chairman of the tribunal differed from the two and upheld Oyetola’s election.
PDP and Adeleke asked the tribunal to declare that he polled the highest lawful votes and should be declared the winner.
But Oyetola, APC and INEC had filed their notices of preliminary
objection contending among others that the petition was incompetent and
that the court lacked jurisdiction.
objection contending among others that the petition was incompetent and
that the court lacked jurisdiction.
The tribunal’s majority verdict also held that the supplementary
election by INEC in seven cancelled units on Sept. 22,2018, was null and
void.
election by INEC in seven cancelled units on Sept. 22,2018, was null and
void.
The tribunal ruled that the Returning Officer who cancelled the results had no power to do so.
The tribunal had earlier dismissed the objections of the APC and Oyetola. It said Adeleke’s petition has merit.
The two-man majority also declared the rerun election as illegal.
Delivering the ruling, Chairman Ibrahim Sirajo, held that the objections were misconceived and struck them out.
The Tribunal held that the CTC should and must be an exact replica of the EC8A pink copies.
The discrepancies must therefore be explained and justified by INEC.
In this instance, the tribunal held, INEC failed to explain nor
justify the alterations and that they failed to call any witness to
justify the alterations.
justify the alterations and that they failed to call any witness to
justify the alterations.
The tribunal held that the attempt to explain the alterations on the
basis of mere corrections of errors is not acceptable and the fact that
the said errors were consistently made in the disputed areas means it
was a deliberate action taken.
basis of mere corrections of errors is not acceptable and the fact that
the said errors were consistently made in the disputed areas means it
was a deliberate action taken.