N4.7bn fraud: Ladoja knows fate today

Gov Abiodun congratulates Charles Akinola on appointment as Managing Director, South West Development Commission

Oba Adenugba congratulates Tele Ogunjobi on appointment as Executive Director, South West Development Commission

Senator Salisu Shuaib donates solar power system, laptops to Ogun NUJ

Former Oyo State Governor, Chief Rashidi Ladoja, on trial for the past
12 years for an alleged N4.7billion fraud will know his fate today.

Rashidi Ladoja

Justice Muhammed Idris of Federal High Court in Lagos will deliver
judgment on the matter. Ladoja is facing trial along with former
commissioner for finance, Waheed Akanbi.

The Nation reported that the parties have been served with hearing notices.

Lead prosecuting counsel Mr Festus Keyamo (SAN) confirmed that his law firm got the judgment notice.

Justice Idris had reserved judgment in the criminal case on 21
January after counsel representing parties adopted their final addresses
before the court.

Ladoja was charged by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission
(EFCC) with converting N4.7billion from the State’s treasury to his
personal use.

He was re-arraigned along with Akanbi on an 11 count charge of money
laundering and unlawful conversion of public funds. Both pleaded not
guilty to the charge, and were granted bail.

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that evidences in the trial
closed on Nov. 17, 2018 after Ladoja had given his evidence before the
court.

The court then adjourned for adoption of final addresses.

The prosecutor, Mr Oluwafemi Olabisi urged the court to hold that the
prosecution had been able to establish its case against the accused
based on evidences adduced.

He argued that the crux of the prosecution’s case centred on money received as proceeds of crime.

According to him, offences of this nature do not give room for acknowledgment of monies taken from government coffers.

He added that the court was enjoined to look at circumstantial evidences in arriving at its decision.

Olabisi urged the court to discountenance evidences adduced by
defence witnesses, and hold that the prosecution had been able to
establish its case against the accused.

On his part, defense counsel, Mr Adeyinka Olumide-Fusika urged the
court to discharge and acquit the accused on the grounds that the
prosecution had a weak case incapable of securing any conviction.

“If there is no foundation, the super structure cannot stand,” he said.

Olumide-Fusika argued that no prosecution witness was able to link
the accused with the alleged offences, adding that the prosecution was
only concerned with securing conviction at all cost.

Besides, the defence counsel argued that the statement used by the
prosecutor in his written address that “the second defendant in the very
least, did conspire to commit the offence” was incapable of
establishing his guilt.

He urged the court to be sensitive to evidences adduced as PW2 who
testified as having engaged in the sale of the Oyo State shares was
never charged.

In all, he urged the court to discharge and acquit the accused as
there was no shred of evidences against them, adding that the evidences
by prosecution witnesses, even supports the innocence of the accused.

After listening to the submissions of counsel, Justice Idris commended them for seeing the trial to conclusion.

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reported that after the close of
prosecution’s case, the accused had opted to file a no case submission
before the court, contending that the prosecution failed to establish a
case against them.

But in its ruling, the court dismissed the no case submission, and
held that based on a preponderance of evidences as put forward by
prosecution, there was no doubt that the accused had some explanations
to make.

NAN reported that in the charge, the accused were alleged to have
conspired to siphon and launder N4.7 billion from the coffers of Oyo
State government.

The EFCC also accused them of converting N1.9 billion belonging to
the state for their personal use through the account of a company known
as Heritage Apartments Ltd.

The anti-graft agency claimed that the accused retained the money
sometime in 2007, in spite of their knowledge that it was proceeds from a
criminal activity.

Ladoja was accused of removing £600,000 pounds from the state coffers in 2007, which he sent to his daughter, Bimpe in London.

In addition, the ex-governor was accused of converting N42 million
belonging to the state for his personal use and subsequently used same
to purchase an armoured Land Cruiser.

The EFCC added that Ladoja converted N728 million and N77 million at
different times in 2007 for his personal use and transferred same to
Bistrum Investments for the purchase of a property in Ibadan.

The offences contravened the provisions of Sections 14, 16, 17 (a)
and 18 (1) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2004, according to
the EFCC.